how does your world peace proposal measure up ... ?

In my view, it is folly for humankind to assume everlasting dominance over this planet called earth, or over anything.

Humans, like any other species, will continue to live and thrive on earth only as long as natural universal forces allow.

One may view such change as "Will of God" or as balance of Mother Nature or Health of Earth Mother Gaia, inevitable result of Karma, or as from any of a number of other "causes" - all good to my way of thinking, since "conscience of spirit" resides within the individual's *private sphere*

For me, a *perfect world* is one within which different belief systems reside peacefully together; in which alternative systems of organizing and administrating societies work cooperatively.

There is no *perfect* society except as it is "perfect" to the individual human being who chooses to be a part of it.

I hold it is a construct of men's (women traditionally "rolling with" (so to speak) men's foolishness until women tire of it) thinking that anything is necessarily *one thing as opposed to another*

- that in fact, all natural systems, of which humankind is but a part, are in constant flux and renewal; that change is the only constant.

"Adapt or die" being the rallying cry of any species or individual organism with a mind to continue its existence.
_

Calls for a "personal plan for world peace" are, I believe, worthy; in other words, we are healthy as we exercise our ability to seek solutions which allow and enhance our adapting to the changes we inevitably and without fail encounter.

... however, to be of a mind that there is any specific plan that would be somehow "good for everyone everywhere for all time" is folly, and most likely detracts from real solutions that can be provided to near-term challenges; wishful thinking and delusion.

There is also, I believe, a warning within the Christian belief system of an entity which will appear on the world stage offering some promise of comfort to everyone equally - that warning accompanied by admonishment not to follow such a "leader" who is foretold to be a *deceiver*
_

The story of the boy who "cried wolf" is that of someone who sought to gain personal attention - his alarms based on no threat which could be perceived by anyone hearing them.

Within some "civilized" modern societies, no longer is there much connection to "natural dangers" for people who take for granted being warm, or not too hot; having enough to eat, a wide variety of choices when considering a purchase, and so on ...

... yet to live as if no danger exists is simply "adapting to extinction"

The individual who, when an alarm is sounded, simply ignores the alarm, is less likely to survive in the long run, which for humans goes "relatively" unnoticed since none of us live forever anyway - a prevailing attitude among some being that there is no need to heed any alarms at all.
_

Health is generally a product of balance - excess leads to "unhealth" whether eating too much, or not enough, for instance.

There is no "restoring" to health a body which has been starved or glutted for too long.

Just as sleep is a rhythmical renewal process in which "enough" is required in each cycle (no way to make it up), when systems of government or overall health of a planet are allowed to progress uncontrolled, at some point there will be a convulsive "adjustment"

So a "plan for world peace" has to start with each and every individual being *informed* and aware - maintaining a healthy state of existence, fully able to interact and perform as needed no matter what "crisis" presents itself.

Garbage must be removed daily - not when we get around to it.
.