what will they say about Liberty then ... ?

.
What will be the mental state, 10, 20, 30 years from now, of the then-no-longer-young men and women who today are in Iraq and Afghanistan, and may by then have been to other places "in the name of Liberty" ...

... when their "liberty" to "own" livestock as a way of providing "subsistence" is limited to that of *stakeholder* relative to the "national herd" ?

"national herd" is not a new term in the U.S., but it now has the USDA "seal of approval" stamped squarely on it, and I read that term to mean something other that *private ownership*
- put another way, that term represents something unConstitutional.

Under NAIS, assembled with NO input from the public (much the same as NAU - UNdemocratic), within two months *ownership* of the "national herd" will have been acquired by the United States federal government, through a plan which is, of course, "voluntary at the federal level"

Never mind that if you will own livestock outside of the "voluntary" system, you WILL be *criminalized* and risk LOSING your entire "investment" with NO recourse under the law, once NAIS is finally "legitimized" through the same sort of processes which are converting our entire administrative law system into something *other than* U.S. in nature.


Young men and women who "volunteered" to serve after building their own "anti-Communist" persona ("Dad died fighting Communism, and I want to be just like Dad") who today fight *terrorism* - created as a speedy replacement to Communism in order to to prevent *bankruptcy* of the military-industrial-security

-nuclear-pharma complex - will find themselves locked out of any traditional role in American agriculture, and even the "real estate" of farming will be locked into a communistic system.


What will they say then about "liberty" ... ?

Of course if you are today 60 or older ...

-- quite likely you are only waiting for the Rapture --

... so none of this is important to you even a bit.

"You look marvellous after your shampoo," the recliner said to the sofa ...


See:
- http://www.newswithviews.com/Hannes/doreenA.htm
.

manufacturing consent the old-fashioned way ...

.
Having thought about it ...

The reason for "open borders" and the "flood of illegal immigrants" is simple.

As I have said before, the U.S. has had so-called "illegals" coming across the southern border for decades, but the "problem" was never a "crisis" until recently.

Media has been led, sometimes unwittingly, and most often with help, into developing the old "problem" into our current "crisis" and in some parts of the U.S. today, people would be little more aware than they ever were that a "problem" even exists except for hearing and reading about it constantly in the press and on radio and television.

Today, one of the most "urgent" issues in America is "redesigning" our forms of identification - primarily driver's licenses - for which "proof" of citizenship now hinges upon having a Social Security Number.

In other words, you and I cannot get the "new" driver's license in any state without having, and providing, proof of our own Social Security Number.

Now some states have tied SSN to issuance of DL's for a number of years, even in the face of citizen protests - primarily those of us who recall the "original promise" that a Social Security Number would not be used for "identification"

The "finest generation" which objected most strongly to using SSN for ID is rapidly disappearing, and the few who remain are too feeble care any longer about matters of "identification."

Their children are of an age and condition for which they mostly seem content to argue with each other about who is to blame for the "failure" - from government itself all the way to the "undocumented border crossers" themselves - so that the real agenda being served does not even occur to them.

A new generation has been fully "indoctrinated" to provide SSN for just about any perceived "need" and even offers the information when SSN is not needed for anything at all, as if they never knew SSN was not to be used as and "identifying number."

So the "final push" in solidifying SSN as an *American Identification Number* is now under way, meeting little resistance in face of the threat of "terrorism" and a need to *secure* the U.S. against "foreign invaders" such as those "undocumented" people who come into the U.S. any way they can.

In other words, the "crisis" was manufactured to disguise the purpose of making SSN the "legal ID" number for all Americans, and it seems to be working very well.
.

if you love wealth better than liberty ...

.

"If you love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen."

-- Samuel Adams 1776

no god-damned corporation gets to censor us !!!

.
Okay, so send this message to everyone you know, right now:

“If mothers ruled the world, there would be no god-damned wars
in the first place.”

Attribute that line to Sally Field who had courage last night to say it in front of the entire world.

Whatever is Fixed News' role in diminishing Field's statement is their problem.

We will not accept censorship !
- Americans w i l l n o t a c c e p t c e n s o r s h i p


Whether or not God exists is irrelevant to what Sally Field said last night.

What Sally Field said last night has nothing to do with religion

Wars are conducted every day in spite of religion - in spite of God.

If you believe God is alive, do you really think God approves of WAR ???

Sally Field spoke truth, and no god-damned corporation gets to censor it
- period !!!

- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m0Ftq9N4fzo

.

what do we say to Veterans this day of Independence ... ?

.
What do we say to our Veterans now ?

What do we say to those who served selflessly in World War II or in Korea - even in Viet Nam ?

Those who obeyed all the rules, not knowing how rules had been bent.

Those who did not understand the "game" and how they were being used ?


What do we say to all the men and women who have left parts of themselves in other countries ?

Thinking they were defending their own country in some way while protecting their own freedoms.

Men and women missing body parts - minds permanently altered and souls forever scarred.

Possessed of illness and contamination - treatment for which their government denies them.


What do we say to our Veterans of all ages this July 4, 2007 about why their friends died half a world away from home?

If we, as a people, will now quietly allow "Building a North American Community" to proceed.

North American Union backers have "already declared before our Congress, that our borders are to be eliminated by 2010"

What did our friends and relatives die for ? - what were they defending which now has so little value if it can be given away so easily ?


American's passivity strengthens Tyranny already upon us while we "celebrate" our *INDEPENDENCE*

Hollow victory today for those among us who sell or give away our victories for "inalienable rights" of humans on Earth.

What do we say to our Veterans today about what we are celebrating and the price they have paid ?

What do we say to ourselves for what we have become ?

.

Excellence in Television Broadcasting - Finally !!!

.
Mika Brzezinski refused to open with a story about an obnoxious young woman who was recently released from jail.

On being urged to open her CBS television segment with that story, she ripped up the paper it was printed on after attempting to set fire to it on camera.

- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6VdNcCcweL0

Kudos to Mika Brzezinski !!!

- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xAcU3HSMKPU

We hope to see a lot more of such sanity "on camera"

PLEASE !

.

The Third Terrorist ...

.
Started reading Jayna Davis' "The Third Terrorist" finally ...

Was immediately put off by use of the word "Arab"

"The bombing and murder of innocents was a classic operation of Arab terrorists, and the method conformed to the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center in New York and the attack on the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia."

While all that is undisputably true, why should "Arab terrorists" bother me, you might ask.

To answer that, first I would ask, "Why Arab ?"
- why not Egyptian, or Persian, or ... ?

Truck bombing IS and has been "a classic operation of Arab terrorists" and of others.

Where did "Arabs" learn such tactics ?

Right now if you do a google search for "first truck bomb" you will see that term used in so many ways, and every item on the first page relates to "arab terrorists"
... but you will still not know.

What WAS the first truck bombing incident ?

Again, history begins too late for too many Americans who do not study history.


wikipedia offers a "List of terrorist incidents"
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents


Enlightening, but not enough by itself - of course there were no trucks until the Twentieth Century, but the same could have been accomplished with a horse-drawn wagon.

"The Wall Street bombing was a terrorist incident that occurred at 12:01 p.m. on September 16, 1920, in the Financial District of New York City. It was the deadliest bomb attack on American soil for seven years, until the Bath School disaster. Thirty-eight were killed and 400 persons were injured by the blast.[1]

"At noon, a horse-drawn wagon passed by lunchtime crowds on Wall Street in New York City. The wagon then stopped across the street from the headquarters of the J.P. Morgan Inc. bank at 23 Wall Street, on the Financial District's busiest corner. Inside, 100 pounds (45 kg) of dynamite with 500 pounds (230 kg) of heavy cast-iron slugs exploded in a timer-set detonation, sending the slugs tearing through the air. The horse and wagon were vaporized. Scores of bodies littered the street, and the bomb caused over $2 million in property damage, wrecking most of the interior spaces of the Morgan building. An automobile was hurled into the air, and glass was shattered for blocks (the damage can still be seen on the buildings today [1]). Word soon spread that another bomb was nearby, creating further panic."
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wall_Street_Bombing


No mention of "Arabs" there at all as I can see.


1933 October 10: A Boeing 247 is destroyed in midflight by a nitroglycerin bomb. All seven people aboard are killed. This incident is the first proven case of air sabotage in the history of aviation.
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Airlines_Chesterton_Crash

Ctrl F on that page for "arab" produces no results.


1946 July 22: Bombing of King David Hotel, the British Military HQ in Jerusalem, by the Zionist group Irgun, with 91 deaths
- a mix of military and civilian

"The King David Hotel bombing (July 22, 1946) was a bombing attack against the British government of Palestine by members of Irgun — a militant Zionist organization.
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_David_Hotel_bombing

The attack on the King David Hotel was NOT the same sort of "classic (truck bomb) operation" to be sure, though milk cans were delivered by truck.

Did the incident set an example for a tactic that could be improved ?


1954: Lavon Affair – Mossad agents bomb targets in Egypt, attempting to discredit the Egyptian government.
The account of the Lavon Affair does not mention "Arab" except that the "affair" related to "Arab-Israeli conflict · History"
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lavon_Affair


Basques and Puerto Rican nationalists may have used tactics similar to truck bombings in the 70's

The first "car bomb" incident I found in that list was:
March 30: A car bomb explodes in the Palace of Westminster car park killing the driver. The Irish National Liberation Army (INLA) claimed responsibility for the killing. (see Airey Neave)"
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents


1984 April 18: U.S. Embassy Bombing in Beirut, Lebanon kills 63.
That is the first mention I find of a "suicide bombing" which was "detonated in a delivery van driven by a suicide bomber, carrying about 2000 pounds of explosives"
... yet even that report nowhere includes the word "Arab" because ...

"A U.S. District court judge ruled in 2003 that the attack was by what had been at the
time been a new organization called Hezbollah supported by the state of Iran."
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_1983_US_Embassy_bombing


1985 March 8: Car bomb explodes in Beirut, killing 80, injuring 175; reportedly planned and executed by the United States Central Intelligence Agency.[21]


Today, you can talk with just about anyone in the U.S. and mention of "car bomb" or "truck bomb" seems to immediately equate to "Arab terrorist"

WHY IS THAT ???
.