President Clinton blasts Chris Wallace ...
Clinton's saying:
" ... neocons claimed that I was too obsessed with finding Bin Laden when they didn’t have a single meeting about Bin Laden for the nine months after I left office. All the right-wingers who now say that I didn’t do enough said (then) that I did too much. Same people." ... is true, to the point, but misses a greater point.
Such an action (in this case neocon's politicizing Clinton's "level of interest" in OBL) is political, which is what gets people's (our) attention ... missing that the very same politicization originates *beyond* (outside and above) government with the express intention of manipulating government, and of subverting the power of The People.
If Clinton is aware of it, as surely he must be considering all that he is clearly capable of (finely tuned political animal that he is), then he is either ignoring or dismissing (warding off instead of exposing) the roots of the *action* - which is an *action* I do not suppose Clinton himself is above using to his own advantage.
Clinton attacks here because:
- keeping the issue a "me vs neocon" fight holds the issue to a political level - "a political issue" as you assume it to be
- Clinton has to (is conditioned to) respond to keep you and the rest of us (even CW) from asking the real questions
- the attack draws (subverts) our attention to a phony issue (me vs _____)
- to knowledgeably discuss the *cause* of the "claims" would expose the roots; thus the lie of the "unelected" government (self-defeat)
Clinton IS the "relatively obscure" Arkansas governor who suddenly burst into the presidential race.
Clinton IS one of the chosen.
Time to think more clearly about who does the "choosing" i'n't it ?
Whether Clinton is right or wrong is beside the point while this entire interview is staged (nothing to do with Clinton, CW is a bystander) - a ripe cherry plucked by the "unelected" to subvert the attention of The People from the real issues ... all of which does not make Rupert Murdoch any more of a decision maker.
Knowingly or not, each one plays a role, and is played ...
" ... neocons claimed that I was too obsessed with finding Bin Laden when they didn’t have a single meeting about Bin Laden for the nine months after I left office. All the right-wingers who now say that I didn’t do enough said (then) that I did too much. Same people." ... is true, to the point, but misses a greater point.
Such an action (in this case neocon's politicizing Clinton's "level of interest" in OBL) is political, which is what gets people's (our) attention ... missing that the very same politicization originates *beyond* (outside and above) government with the express intention of manipulating government, and of subverting the power of The People.
If Clinton is aware of it, as surely he must be considering all that he is clearly capable of (finely tuned political animal that he is), then he is either ignoring or dismissing (warding off instead of exposing) the roots of the *action* - which is an *action* I do not suppose Clinton himself is above using to his own advantage.
Clinton attacks here because:
- keeping the issue a "me vs neocon" fight holds the issue to a political level - "a political issue" as you assume it to be
- Clinton has to (is conditioned to) respond to keep you and the rest of us (even CW) from asking the real questions
- the attack draws (subverts) our attention to a phony issue (me vs _____)
- to knowledgeably discuss the *cause* of the "claims" would expose the roots; thus the lie of the "unelected" government (self-defeat)
Clinton IS the "relatively obscure" Arkansas governor who suddenly burst into the presidential race.
Clinton IS one of the chosen.
Time to think more clearly about who does the "choosing" i'n't it ?
Whether Clinton is right or wrong is beside the point while this entire interview is staged (nothing to do with Clinton, CW is a bystander) - a ripe cherry plucked by the "unelected" to subvert the attention of The People from the real issues ... all of which does not make Rupert Murdoch any more of a decision maker.
Knowingly or not, each one plays a role, and is played ...
posted by JamesB | 7:19 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home