the issue of conspiracy ...

A few days ago I went to wikipedia to check something about Ramzi Yousef. On his page it said he had gotten back bomb manuals taken from Ahmed Ajaj by FBI when he entered U.S. According to Peter Lance, those manuals were never claimed, but remained at FBI's New York office (Cover Up p 51)
[was that office destroyed 9/11 ?]

Got me thinking - what other errors might be found in wikipedia ... along with hearing mixed "facts" in just about any comment to do with September 11, 2001. Similar errors on page of Ajaj, who entered U.S. with Yousef ...

Why should I care whether people have those facts straight ? I will live maybe another 20 years and pass on. The world will continue without me. Few will notice my absence. What will be will be.

True as that is, it is also true that right now the United States is conducting a war in Iraq called "Operation Iraqi Freedom" - a profitable venture:
http://www.montereycoins.com/custom-coins-gallery.html

Questions whether U.S. has right to invade a sovereign nation divide the American people, who generally seem to accept the "reasons" given them for that war: links between Saddam Hussein and 9/11 for instance. There was no link between Saddam and 9/11 except as manufactured by U.S. government officials. Who are those officials, and why did they adopt such a policy, which has as of this writing claimed lives of a reported 37936 Iraqi civilians (or more) and 2332 US Military Deaths. Another 204 Coalition troops have been killed, plus 284 US military lost in Afghanistan. How many Afghani civilians have died since 2001 ?

Whether or not voting has been manipulated in U.S. in the last two national elections, Americans voted. It is my view that their choices, and the decisions resulting from those elections, are based on shabby knowledge.

September 11, 2001, is the flash point - the emotional spark used to start the fire now known as Operation Iraqi Freedom:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/iraq/

It is my view that trillions of dollars paid by American taxpayers give us the right to expect a level of performance from our government. Billions spent to fund U.S. Intelligence agencies were clearly not wasted, since they (and thus we) knew of the presence of Al Qaeda operating in the U.S. as early as 1989.

So my question is, how and why can it be that what happened on September 11 was ALLOWED to happen. We knew it was coming, and we knew we could stop it, but "we" chose not to. Who made that decision, and why was that decision made ?

According to Webster: conspiracy:
. 1 : the act of conspiring together
. 2 a : an agreement among conspirators b : a group of conspirators
_
"The crime of conspiracy, according to its modern interpretation, may be of two kinds, namely, conspiracies against the public, or such as endanger the public health, violate public morals, insult public justice, destroy the public peace, or affect public trade or business.
The 'Lectric Law Library's Legal Lexicon On * Conspiracy * "
- http://www.rense.com/general9/cons.htm
See also: CONSPIRACY - 18 U.S.C. 371 which "makes it a separate Federal crime or offense for anyone to conspire or agree with someone else to do something which, if actually carried out, would amount to another Federal crime or offense. So, under this law, a 'conspiracy' is an agreement or a kind of 'partnership' in criminal purposes in which each member becomes the agent or partner of every other member."
_

Is there a time near when we will discuss * Conspiracy * within the top levels of United States government ?

Clearly to me, under the terms referenced above, Ramzi Yousef is guilty of conspiracy. Yousef and Ajaj planned their entry, with Ajaj in possession of materials the two men were sure would cause a stir. They were right. After flying as first-class seatmates, arriving at Kennedy Airport September 1, 1992, Ajaj was given the last bed that night in INS holding facility, while Yousef, using an alias, already a wanted known terrorist, claimed he had lost his passport and requested political asylum.

"Ramzi Yousef" entered the U.S. in September 1992 on an Iraqi passport, with stamps showing a journey beginning in Baghdad - attested by the inspector who admitted Yousef into the U.S. In 1995, Laurie Mylroie argued Yousef was an Iraqi intelligence agent, while Richard Clarke said Yousef had no passport. Credibility of the very people responsible for initiating war is called to question.

Who is telling truth ? Why would one official lie ? ... or at least not have such a crucial fact straight ?

Abdul Yasin, indicted for 1993 WTC attack, was set free and encouraged to leave the U.S. with full knowledge and approval of US Attorneys involved in the case. Later, "evidence" that Saddam Hussein's regime gave money and housing to Yasin was used to point out Iraqi involvement in 9/11

You must be the final judge whether there is evidence of Conspiracy.