what will they say about Liberty then ... ?

.
What will be the mental state, 10, 20, 30 years from now, of the then-no-longer-young men and women who today are in Iraq and Afghanistan, and may by then have been to other places "in the name of Liberty" ...

... when their "liberty" to "own" livestock as a way of providing "subsistence" is limited to that of *stakeholder* relative to the "national herd" ?

"national herd" is not a new term in the U.S., but it now has the USDA "seal of approval" stamped squarely on it, and I read that term to mean something other that *private ownership*
- put another way, that term represents something unConstitutional.

Under NAIS, assembled with NO input from the public (much the same as NAU - UNdemocratic), within two months *ownership* of the "national herd" will have been acquired by the United States federal government, through a plan which is, of course, "voluntary at the federal level"

Never mind that if you will own livestock outside of the "voluntary" system, you WILL be *criminalized* and risk LOSING your entire "investment" with NO recourse under the law, once NAIS is finally "legitimized" through the same sort of processes which are converting our entire administrative law system into something *other than* U.S. in nature.


Young men and women who "volunteered" to serve after building their own "anti-Communist" persona ("Dad died fighting Communism, and I want to be just like Dad") who today fight *terrorism* - created as a speedy replacement to Communism in order to to prevent *bankruptcy* of the military-industrial-security

-nuclear-pharma complex - will find themselves locked out of any traditional role in American agriculture, and even the "real estate" of farming will be locked into a communistic system.


What will they say then about "liberty" ... ?

Of course if you are today 60 or older ...

-- quite likely you are only waiting for the Rapture --

... so none of this is important to you even a bit.

"You look marvellous after your shampoo," the recliner said to the sofa ...


See:
- http://www.newswithviews.com/Hannes/doreenA.htm
.

manufacturing consent the old-fashioned way ...

.
Having thought about it ...

The reason for "open borders" and the "flood of illegal immigrants" is simple.

As I have said before, the U.S. has had so-called "illegals" coming across the southern border for decades, but the "problem" was never a "crisis" until recently.

Media has been led, sometimes unwittingly, and most often with help, into developing the old "problem" into our current "crisis" and in some parts of the U.S. today, people would be little more aware than they ever were that a "problem" even exists except for hearing and reading about it constantly in the press and on radio and television.

Today, one of the most "urgent" issues in America is "redesigning" our forms of identification - primarily driver's licenses - for which "proof" of citizenship now hinges upon having a Social Security Number.

In other words, you and I cannot get the "new" driver's license in any state without having, and providing, proof of our own Social Security Number.

Now some states have tied SSN to issuance of DL's for a number of years, even in the face of citizen protests - primarily those of us who recall the "original promise" that a Social Security Number would not be used for "identification"

The "finest generation" which objected most strongly to using SSN for ID is rapidly disappearing, and the few who remain are too feeble care any longer about matters of "identification."

Their children are of an age and condition for which they mostly seem content to argue with each other about who is to blame for the "failure" - from government itself all the way to the "undocumented border crossers" themselves - so that the real agenda being served does not even occur to them.

A new generation has been fully "indoctrinated" to provide SSN for just about any perceived "need" and even offers the information when SSN is not needed for anything at all, as if they never knew SSN was not to be used as and "identifying number."

So the "final push" in solidifying SSN as an *American Identification Number* is now under way, meeting little resistance in face of the threat of "terrorism" and a need to *secure* the U.S. against "foreign invaders" such as those "undocumented" people who come into the U.S. any way they can.

In other words, the "crisis" was manufactured to disguise the purpose of making SSN the "legal ID" number for all Americans, and it seems to be working very well.
.