The Nordsman Test — A Real "Patriot Act"
Expected to be final version:
_
The Nordsman Test — A Real "Patriot Act"
(Prove the Government account of 911 and win $1,000,000)
Answer these three questions of the 911 Commission Report. If you are unable to scientifically answer even one question, you must, as an intellectual and more importantly, as a patriot, question the official explanation of the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001.
A ball dropped from the top of the WTC would fall at free fall speed. If the ball encountered any resistance along the way, such as wind, it would obviously fall slower. The towers both fell at free fall speed. Both collapsed to the ground in about 10 seconds. 110 stories completely collapsed in about 10 seconds. If the pancake theory, which is the official explanation, is correct, then every floor hit the floor beneath it, causing it too to fall and so on until it reached the bottom. For simplicity sake, let’s lop off the tops of the buildings and just work with the bottom 100 floors for a moment. This means that every floor dropped in .1 seconds. Ten floors dropped in one second. A hundred floors dropped in ten seconds. Galileo’s Law of Falling Bodies calculates the time an object will travel in free fall speed. Distance = 16.08 x (seconds squared). The distance of the south tower from top to bottom was 1362 feet. 16.08 x 84.7 (or 9.2 seconds squared) = 1362 feet. A ball would drop from the top in 9.2 seconds. The south tower fell in about ten seconds.
Question 1: Based on the pancake theory, each floor would naturally have encountered resistance from the floor beneath it. Where did the resistance go?
Larry Silverstein, owner of the WTC complex, admitted in a PBS documentary, that in consultation with ‘a fire captain’ on September 11, 2001, the decision was made to ‘pull’ WTC Building 7. ‘Pull’ is the accepted term in the demolition industry meaning to implode; the use of carefully placed and precisely timed explosives to collapse a building inward onto itself. Silverstein has since, issued a statement through a publicist, stating that he meant, ‘pull it’, as to the removal of people from the building. There were two small fires and some visible damage to WTC 7 from the collapse of the towers. However, there were buildings much closer to the towers with more substantial damage and fires, and yet, they are repaired and standing today. Larry Silverstein, having admitted to pulling Building 7, creates our next conundrum.
Question 2: Since it is literally impossible to wire a building to implode in less than eight hours (the time from the first collapsed tower to the time WTC 7 collapsed) and since nobody has even admitted to wiring the building to implode on September 11, 2001; how did WTC Building 7 collapse into it’s own footprint at free fall speed? Hint. You will not find this explained in the 911 Commission Report.
The WTC towers were a marvel of engineering. There were 47 steel re-enforced columns that formed the core of each building. The steel was certified to ASTM E119, which means samples were exposed to 2000 degrees Fahrenheit for several hours and they did not weaken or melt. Keep in mind that the steel in the towers was wrapped in a blanket of asbestos insulation. The majority of the ten thousand gallons of jet fuel burned off immediately in the initial impact in fireballs. The maximum temperature of a flame in open air is 1800 degrees Fahrenheit. FEMA and NIST claim a temperature of only 900 degrees Fahrenheit was reached to weaken the steel. The fires remaining after the initial explosions were emanating black smoke, which is the sign of a fire starving for air or oxygen.
Question 3. Part 1: How did a fire that at maximum, reached 1800 degrees for a very short period of time, sever 47 steel re-enforced columns, at exactly the same time, causing the symmetrical collapse of the towers?
Part 2: What caused the steel columns to sever at every single floor facilitating the collapse? In other words, if the columns were severed due to jet fuel at the impact site of the planes, then after the pancaking of the floors, there should have been the remains of the 47 columns, which were never exposed to fire.
If you cannot answer all three of these questions using science and logic, then it is your patriotic duty to pass this test on to as many people as possible, especially highly intelligent, logically motivated thinkers. Patriotism should be enough, but Jimmy Walter is offering $1,000,000 to anyone who can prove that the trade centers came down without explosives. Please see the following link.
http://www.reopen911.org/Contest.htm
_
The Nordsman Test — A Real "Patriot Act"
(Prove the Government account of 911 and win $1,000,000)
Answer these three questions of the 911 Commission Report. If you are unable to scientifically answer even one question, you must, as an intellectual and more importantly, as a patriot, question the official explanation of the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001.
A ball dropped from the top of the WTC would fall at free fall speed. If the ball encountered any resistance along the way, such as wind, it would obviously fall slower. The towers both fell at free fall speed. Both collapsed to the ground in about 10 seconds. 110 stories completely collapsed in about 10 seconds. If the pancake theory, which is the official explanation, is correct, then every floor hit the floor beneath it, causing it too to fall and so on until it reached the bottom. For simplicity sake, let’s lop off the tops of the buildings and just work with the bottom 100 floors for a moment. This means that every floor dropped in .1 seconds. Ten floors dropped in one second. A hundred floors dropped in ten seconds. Galileo’s Law of Falling Bodies calculates the time an object will travel in free fall speed. Distance = 16.08 x (seconds squared). The distance of the south tower from top to bottom was 1362 feet. 16.08 x 84.7 (or 9.2 seconds squared) = 1362 feet. A ball would drop from the top in 9.2 seconds. The south tower fell in about ten seconds.
Question 1: Based on the pancake theory, each floor would naturally have encountered resistance from the floor beneath it. Where did the resistance go?
Larry Silverstein, owner of the WTC complex, admitted in a PBS documentary, that in consultation with ‘a fire captain’ on September 11, 2001, the decision was made to ‘pull’ WTC Building 7. ‘Pull’ is the accepted term in the demolition industry meaning to implode; the use of carefully placed and precisely timed explosives to collapse a building inward onto itself. Silverstein has since, issued a statement through a publicist, stating that he meant, ‘pull it’, as to the removal of people from the building. There were two small fires and some visible damage to WTC 7 from the collapse of the towers. However, there were buildings much closer to the towers with more substantial damage and fires, and yet, they are repaired and standing today. Larry Silverstein, having admitted to pulling Building 7, creates our next conundrum.
Question 2: Since it is literally impossible to wire a building to implode in less than eight hours (the time from the first collapsed tower to the time WTC 7 collapsed) and since nobody has even admitted to wiring the building to implode on September 11, 2001; how did WTC Building 7 collapse into it’s own footprint at free fall speed? Hint. You will not find this explained in the 911 Commission Report.
The WTC towers were a marvel of engineering. There were 47 steel re-enforced columns that formed the core of each building. The steel was certified to ASTM E119, which means samples were exposed to 2000 degrees Fahrenheit for several hours and they did not weaken or melt. Keep in mind that the steel in the towers was wrapped in a blanket of asbestos insulation. The majority of the ten thousand gallons of jet fuel burned off immediately in the initial impact in fireballs. The maximum temperature of a flame in open air is 1800 degrees Fahrenheit. FEMA and NIST claim a temperature of only 900 degrees Fahrenheit was reached to weaken the steel. The fires remaining after the initial explosions were emanating black smoke, which is the sign of a fire starving for air or oxygen.
Question 3. Part 1: How did a fire that at maximum, reached 1800 degrees for a very short period of time, sever 47 steel re-enforced columns, at exactly the same time, causing the symmetrical collapse of the towers?
Part 2: What caused the steel columns to sever at every single floor facilitating the collapse? In other words, if the columns were severed due to jet fuel at the impact site of the planes, then after the pancaking of the floors, there should have been the remains of the 47 columns, which were never exposed to fire.
If you cannot answer all three of these questions using science and logic, then it is your patriotic duty to pass this test on to as many people as possible, especially highly intelligent, logically motivated thinkers. Patriotism should be enough, but Jimmy Walter is offering $1,000,000 to anyone who can prove that the trade centers came down without explosives. Please see the following link.
http://www.reopen911.org/Contest.htm
posted by JamesB | 8:12 PM
|
0 comments
